cattle grazing in winer cornfield Mary Drewnoski
MINIMAL COMPACTION: UNL studies found winter grazing of cornfields does not result in biologically significant compaction or negative impacts on subsequent crop yields.

Yes, you can graze residue with minimal compaction

UNL studies find cattle grazing on crop residue in late fall or winter has no major downside.

By Mary Drewnoski

Many crop farmers have concerns that cattle trampling while grazing crop residue will adversely affect soil physical properties and subsequent crop productivity.

Soil compaction, measured as an increase in bulk density or penetration resistance, can affect a plant's ability to acquire water, nutrients and oxygen. Compaction can restrict soil water movement, oxygen and nutrient diffusion to roots, consequently reducing crop yield.

However, studies conducted by the University of Nebraska-Lincoln at seven locations found that grazing in late fall or winter did not result in biologically significant compaction on cropland or negative impacts on subsequent crop yields.

Compaction not a concern
Sixteen years of corn residue grazing in eastern Nebraska did not result in detrimental effects on soil properties (including bulk density and penetration resistance) or crop yields. These fields had silt-clay-loam soil, were managed under no-till and were in a corn-soybean rotation. In fact, fall grazing (November to February) of corn residue improved soybean yields by 3.4 bushels per acre. In a western Nebraska field managed in continuous corn, grazing corn residue for five years did not affect corn yields (148 vs. 154 bushels per acre, for not grazed and grazed, respectively).

A three-year study with five locations in eastern Nebraska also showed that grazing had no impact on subsequent crop yields. Three locations were managed under continuous corn with corn yields of 239 bushels per acre for grazed and 223 bushels per acre for ungrazed (which did not statistically differ). Two locations were in a corn-soybean rotation, with soybean yields not differing between grazed (59 bushels per acre) and ungrazed (62 bushels per acre).

During the last two years, soil penetration resistance was measured in the spring and was found to be slightly increased at two locations. However, the increase in penetration resistance was below the threshold for impeding root growth and did not carry over into the next year.

Expect some surface roughness
It should be noted that an increase in surface roughness due to grazing has been observed, especially under wet soil conditions when the soil is thawed. This can sometimes impede seed placement. A study in southeast Iowa evaluated the effects of grazing corn residue on fields managed under spring tillage or no-till in a corn-soybean rotation over a three-year period. Cows were moved to a new section of the field each month during the winter. Therefore, the impact of grazing was measured in 15 areas for each tillage treatment.

There was only one instance when grazing affected soybean yield. In this instance, researchers reported a reduction in soybean yields from 45 bushels per acre to 41 bushels per acre when corn stover was grazed in the no-till system. Bulk density (soil porosity) was not affected. However, surface roughness was increased in this instance, suggesting seed placement may have been the cause of yield loss.

Added benefits in microbial activity
After 16 years of grazing corn residue, an increase in the soil microbial community was observed (when compared to areas that were not grazed). The effects on the soil microbial community may explain the improvement in soybean yields observed in the grazed treatment because an increase in soil microbes (actinomycete bacteria and saprophytic fungi) may increase the rate of nutrient cycling.

Soil Organic Matter and Nutrient Content
Another concern is that grazing may reduce soil organic matter (due to residue removal) or result in the export of nutrients such as N, P and K. After 16 years of grazing, no differences in soil organic matter, N, P or K were measured. It is important to remember that most of the nutrients (such as N, P, K, Ca, etc.) consumed by cattle are excreted back on the land.

Keeping soil covered
Grazing only removes a small percentage of residue (target 15%) and thus cover is maintained and erosion risk is not substantially increased. However, some cornfields — which due to topography (steep slopes) or low corn grain yield (especially in rotation with other low residue crops like soybeans) — should not be grazed by cattle because there is not enough residue present to provide adequate cover (even before grazing).

Most fields in Nebraska would not fit into this category. Alternatively, grazing can be used as a residue management strategy for high-yielding or continuous corn rotations where excess residue is a problem. The combination of the residue consumption and the increase in microbial activity may be beneficial in these fields.

Grazing corn residues can benefit both cattle and crop producers. Grazing of corn residue can be a low-cost source of winter feed for cattle and a source of income for farmers (without detrimental effects to the land).

Drewnoski is a Nebraska Extension beef systems specialist. This report comes from UNL CropWatch.

TAGS: Crops
Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish